MicroStrategy and Bitcoin: A Colossus with Feet of Clay or a Giant with No Impact? The Debate Shaking the Cryptosphere.

The true test will come not at the peak, but in the storm of the next major bear market.

‘The way we purchase bitcoin has no impact on its price.” The statement was made clearly and unequivocally. It was delivered by Shirish Jajodia, Director of Investor Relations at MicroStrategy, the corporate titan that has made accumulating Bitcoin its raison d'être. As a guest on Natalie Brunell’s Coin Story podcast, the executive attempted to defuse a bombshell, to answer a question on the lips of the entire crypto community: Is the giant MicroStrategy, by purchasing hundreds of thousands of Bitcoins, manipulating the market for its own benefit? His answer was a categorical no. Really?

This assertion, as confident as it may be, seems counterintuitive, even contrary to the most fundamental laws of economics. How can an entity that has methodically removed more than 632,000 Bitcoins from circulation—over 3% of the total supply that will ever exist—claim to be a mere passenger in the market and not one of its pilots? Natalie Brunell’s question is critically relevant because it strikes at the heart of Michael Saylor’s strategy and the very foundations of the market's trust in him. If MicroStrategy is the cause of the price increase, then its performance is merely a self-fulfilling prophecy. If its massive purchases, funded by Wall Street money, dictate the price, the company becomes a machine of influence whose legitimacy could be called into question.

To understand the complexity of this debate, we must dissect MicroStrategy’s argument, confront it with economic reality, and analyze the profound implications of its strategy for both the company and the Bitcoin ecosystem as a whole.

---

Bitcoin Core Vs. Bitcoin Knots: The Silent Duel of the Code's Guardians.

Their difference lies not in the rules of the game, but in the policy they apply around those rules.

---

The Official Narrative: The Art of the Discreet Purchase

Shirish Jajodia’s defense rests on a technical nuance: the method of buying. According to him, the key is liquidity management. “We manage our purchases in a way that they represent a certain proportion of the market’s liquidity,” he explained. “Thus, we do not impinge on the price of Bitcoin.”

In trading jargon, this means MicroStrategy doesn’t just show up with a colossal market order that would instantly clear out the order books and cause a price surge (a phenomenon known as slippage). Instead, the company reportedly uses sophisticated algorithms, such as TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price) or VWAP (Volume-Weighted Average Price), to break its orders into a multitude of micro-transactions. These are executed over long periods (days or even weeks) and spread across multiple exchanges. The goal is to blend into the market’s background noise, to act like a sponge slowly absorbing water rather than a bucket being violently plunged into it.